Site Advisory Council
Bringing site leaders together to enable more efficient clinical trials
Driving Positive Progress for Sites
The Site Advisory Council (SAC) is a collaborative group of leaders from clinical research sites dedicated to enabling more efficient clinical trials. The Council brings actionable solutions to systemic industry challenges, focusing on initiatives that will drive positive progress for the majority of research sites.
Members represent diverse institutions representing leading clinical research organizations across the country.
Veeva facilitates the SAC by providing platform resources, public policy support, and connections to the One Clinical Council to secure industrywide buy-in for solutions.
Our Mission
To bring actionable solutions to systemic industry challenges and drive positive progress for clinical research sites nationwide.
Our Vision
To enable more efficient clinical trials through collaborative leadership and standardized processes across research sites.
Our Values
Collaboration, transparency, and practical innovation that addresses real challenges faced by clinical research sites every day.
About the Council
The Site Advisory Council brings together a diversity of clinical research leaders
organized into 3 distinct Working Groups
11
Council Members
3
Working Groups
10
Research Institutions
Training
Addressing the burden of redundant or irrelevant training requirements.
The working group is focused on how Site Initiation Visit Training translate into early operational friction, with the goal of identifying pathways that directly improve clinical trial readiness, execution, and early operational performance.
Initiatives:
The Site Initiation Visit (SIV) Training Effectiveness Survey is the first of its kind, intended to collect industry-wide data on site initiation visit quality and effectiveness. It correlates "Readiness Gaps" and initial patient enrollment to identify how early training impacts downstream clinical performance in interventional clinical trials.
Responses gathered will be used for quality analysis and anonymized before being leveraged for insights.
Sponsor Payments
Focusing on financial management challenges, with emphasis on the prevalent issues around clinical research sites not being paid on time or in accordance with their clinical trial agreements.
Initiatives:
The members have developed a sponsor payments survey to capture real world data on complications with payment timeliness. This will enable insights which can be leveraged to improve this process across sites and sponsors.
Feasibility
Optimizing feasibility processes, with focus on reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
Initiatives:
The group is currently developing a standardized set of feasibility questions, which when leveraged across sponsors, can reduce survey turnaround times and site burden.
A site-driven pilot of these standardized questions is underway. Participating sites will fill out the standard questions and proactively share them with sponsors prior to completing brand new feasibility requests.
Meet the Site Advisory Council Members
Uniting distinguished clinical research site leaders
Feasibility Working Group
Addressing feasibility inefficiency